While it is true that Google doesn't control the quality of apps that make it to the Android Market, and only removes those that have been reported to cause problems (i.e. malware). And it is also true that bad apps can lead to a bad user experience, hence their decision to return handsets for alternatives - but if the same apps can be downloaded onto pretty much any other Android device, how can he come to the conclusion that returns of Motorola devices are based on bad apps? Especially when he claims that people see Motorola's phones as trustworthy and high quality.
While the company hasn't announced any definite figures for the amount of Atrix phones sold so far, Sanjay Jha did mention that sales weren't as great as they had hoped. The company has also mentioned shipping out 250,000 Xoom tablets but hasn't revealed how many of them actually made it to the hands of customers.
Is Sanjay Jha trying to put the blame for high return rates on the Android app ecosystem? Any previous Motorola owners who have returned their phones care to chime in with your reason for returning their products?
source: Ubergizmo
Related Post:
Motorola
- Motorola ATRIX HD for AT&T becomes official
- Motorola unveils dual-core XT760 for China
- Android 4.0 update for Droid RAZR and RAZR MAXX is a no-show
- Motorola DROID Fighter shows up on camera
- Motorola Atrix receives new update
- Motorola outs Android 4.0 upgrade schedule, adds Atrix 4G, Photon 4G and others to the ICS party list
- AT&T Motorola ATRIX 4.5.141 Update Now Rolling Out
- Motorola Defy Mini will be launched in the UK in late March
- The limited edition Droid RAZR you can never have
- Motorola Defy Mini To Hit UK In Late March
